A couple weeks ago, @ForeProtocol launched their user-generated prediction markets on @arbitrum , using UMA's OO for dispute res

18 Dec 2023, 17:04
A couple weeks ago, @ForeProtocol launched their user-generated prediction markets on @arbitrum , using UMA’s OO for dispute resolution. We’ve been resolving disputes for years and put together the ultimate guide for prediction market creators:

Same news in other sources

3
UMA
UMAUMA #251
Twitter
18 Dec 2023, 17:04
If you’re ready to start applying these tips and create your first prediction market on FORE, check out their official user guide below. And if you have any questions along the way, join the @ForeProtocol discord (link in their bio).
If you're ready to start applying these tips and create your first prediction market on FORE, check out their official user guid
If you’re ready to start applying these tips and create your first prediction market on FORE, check out their official user guide below. And if you have any questions along the way, join the @ForeProtocol discord (link in their bio).
UMA
UMAUMA #251
Twitter
18 Dec 2023, 17:04
Here’s a good example of a prediction market created on @Polymarket . The market creator provided clear rules, a Yes/No outcome, and a trustworthy validation source. They also included an example scenario in the rules to enhance clarity.
Here's a good example of a prediction market created on @Polymarket .
Here’s a good example of a prediction market created on @Polymarket . The market creator provided clear rules, a Yes/No outcome, and a trustworthy validation source. They also included an example scenario in the rules to enhance clarity.
UMA
UMAUMA #251
Twitter
18 Dec 2023, 17:04
Here’s a bad example of a prediction market created on @Polymarket . The market creator failed to acknowledge all the meanings of the word “trump” and which ones counted. This led to two dispute rounds and ultimately settled as “No”.
Here's a bad example of a prediction market created on @Polymarket .
Here’s a bad example of a prediction market created on @Polymarket . The market creator failed to acknowledge all the meanings of the word “trump” and which ones counted. This led to two dispute rounds and ultimately settled as “No”.